Carcinogens Theory
CARCINOGENS THEORY
CARCINOGENS?
Carcinogens are by definition “cancer-causing” agents. The claim that certain chemicals or toxins in our food, in our environment, in cosmetics, or personal care and consumer products cause cancer is either based on pure assumptions or concluded from "carcinogen testing" on live animals.
In light of Dr. Hamer's discoveries, animal testing can never be scientifically valid because animals respond to "conflict shocks" with Biological Special Programs (SBS), that is, with meaningful physiological changes (“diseases”) just as we humans do. Hence, any laboratory condition that gives an animal a “death-fright conflict” will result in lung cancer as will an “existence conflict” cause kidney cancer, and so forth. Claiming that a certain chemical or toxin is the cause of a specific cancer is bad science, as it ignores the setting of the experiment, the animal's perception, and, above all, that animals have feelings and are able to suffer as much as all other living beings.
The practice of animal experimentation in the name of medical research is one of the darkest chapters in the history of mankind and in the history of medicine in particular. The number of animals dying of torture through the practice of vivisection is estimated at around 500.000 a day world-wide. Through ruthless animal testing medical science has assembled over 1000 alleged “carcinogens”, proving only that researchers have found a thousand ways to distress animals with conflict shocks.
  During the experiment, the helpless animals can suffer a number of biological conflicts: “attack conflicts”, “death-fright conflicts”, “existence conflicts”, “territorial conflicts”, “abandonment conflicts”, “self-devaluation conflicts”, and so forth - ALL causing CANCER!
  NO
ANIMAL
TESTING!
  |